Discover Your Perfect Stay

Irving Howe’s Insight on Government and the Consent of the People

Understanding the Original Rise of Governments

8 Effective Strategies to Improve Employee Performance - Kiwi LMS

Governments have a foundational principle that has been long debated by philosophers and political theorists alike – the consent of the governed. Irving Howe was among those who delved into the intricacies of political and societal structures, comprehending that, in the tumult of history's warfare, genuine consent of the people is often overshadowed by the might of arms. This confusion leads many to equate conquest with consent, failing to recognize that the true essence of a legitimate government cannot be forged from force alone.

The Fallacy of Rightful Conquest

Howe asserted the belief that the force of conquest does not equate to the rightful establishment of government. Likening conquest to the demolition of a house, he emphasized that while destruction might pave the way for construction, it cannot, on its own, erect a new edifice of legitimate rule without the people's consent.

The Invader's Illusion

He posited that an invader, no matter how victorious in war or imposing through arms, cannot impose his will as a right over the conquered. Drawing powerful parallels between such tyrants and common thieves, Howe underscored that neither has the moral standing to claim dominion over those subdued by brute force.

The Dynamics within Conquest
The Civil Wars of Julia Ward Howe | Book by Elaine Showalter ...

When examining the dynamics of conquest, Howe reminded us that not all within the conquering party are bent on dominion nor does the act of conquest automatically bequeath lands and possessions of the conquered to the victor. He stated that even within a lawful act of war, the conqueror's power is limited and cannot extend to dominion over lands or lives of those who do not take part in the conflict.

The Role of Despotism and Possession

Irving Howe explored the notion of despotism post-conquest, indicating that while a conqueror may have certain powers over those who have actively aided war, they have no rightful claim over the possessions of the conquered. It's a detailed distinction, separating the spoils of war and the impact on subsequent generations from a conqueror's caprice.

The Journey towards Autonomous Government

The journey towards establishing a government that reflects the true will of its people can be likened to a traveler forging paths in uncharted territories. Every society must navigate the complexities of its historical landscapes, often venturing through the remnants of past conquests to build a representative and consensual political structure.

Reclaiming Ancestral Rights

Hannah Arendt on Anti-Racism as a Totalitarian Ideology - Tablet ...

In the quest for self-governance, citizens strive to reclaim the native rights of their ancestors, akin to travelers revisiting their ancestral homelands. They seek to establish a legislative that resonates with the majority's approval, much like a traveler seeks a hospitable environment that aligns with their preferences.

In Councils and Courts: Asserting the Right to Rule Oneself

The idea of forming a new government based on consensus reflects the determination of people everywhere to rule themselves justly. This is reflected in how today's travelers make informed choices about their destinations, seeking places that acknowledge their autonomy and respect their choices.

The Inheritance of Freedom and Property

The concept of inheriting freedom and the right to own property without undue interference from conquest or oppression is an ideal as cherished in governance as it is in personal endeavors, where travelers seek destinations that honor their rights and afford them the liberty they inherently possess.

The Intersection of Governance, Consent, and Travel

The principles of consent and self-governance outlined by Irving Howe resonate beyond political spheres and into the realm of travel. Just as governments must be built on the consent of the governed, one’s journey and lodging should align with personal choice and volition. Travelers, much like citizens, look for environments that respect their agency, offer hospitality that aligns with their preferences, and support their rights. This mutual pursuit of consent, be it in governance or hospitality, remains an enduring testament to the shared human quest for autonomy and self-determination.

Puerto Rico (Gran Canaria)

Playa del Ingles (Gran Canaria)

San Agustin (Gran Canaria)

Maspalomas (Gran Canaria)

Puerto De Mogan

Arguineguin

Las Palmas de Gran Canaria